Home
Tips and Tricks
Gallery
Links
Downloads
About Me
Contact Me
Simply Beautiful PDF Print
Written by Marin Petrov   
Thursday, 23 April 2009 13:21
 
 
 
 
custom Controls PDF Print
Written by Marin Petrov   
Tuesday, 21 April 2009 15:33

Here is something I wanted to achieve from quite some time now. I have always wanted to make my custom controls on my rigs to be seen BEHIND the other objects. But not simply behind. I wanted them to be transparent if they are behind and filled if they are infront of other objects. Say - the polygonal mesh of the character. I knew that I had to make some OpenGL function calls, but I didn't know how. I didn't even knew if it was possible. Anyway, I made it! A custom locator with controllable color, transparency and backAlpha - which controls how much it will be visible if it is behind other objects :) Take a look:

 
urban skiing PDF Print
Written by Marin Petrov   
Friday, 17 April 2009 10:31

I have always wondered what to do with my snowboard in the summer.

 

 
 
 
OpenGL Fun PDF Print
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 08 April 2009 16:27

I was playing with OpenGL functions today and made a little custom locator inside Maya.

Rainbow Madness:

 

 

Something to note though... When you make custom locators you better do them in C++ . I made this in python first and after 2000 copies the scene started to drag. The same locator, but in C++ took 4000 copies to start dragging. Minimum twice the performance. 

I didn't suppose there will be such a difference. 

 

 

 
Some thoughts on Haskell PDF Print
Written by Administrator   
Wednesday, 01 April 2009 16:48

My friend and colleague Slavi Kaslev first introduced me with Haskell some months ago. I must say I have never ever had and still don't have experience with it. My observations are based on readings and tutorials I have read on the web. What amazed me at first is that it doesn't look like the object oriented languages at all. It's a functional language , which means it uses expressions to evaluate the program. And unlike the other imperative languages it doesn't allow using states. Simply said it avoids using variables. That blew me away when I first heard it. I didn't know how a program would run without using variables. And that's the big trick of Haskell because you had to forget everything you know about programming and start all over again. When Slavi explained to me the basics an idea came to my mind. It's very much like the Dependency Graph in Maya or for example ICE in XSI (although I`m not quite sure for the second one, I only assume it works the same as the DG) . You have a blocks (expressions) , nodes . Every node evaluates something and needs data only from the block(s) before it. Every block exists independantly - it means the block doesn't know and don't need to know where in the graph it lives. It just need some data input and outputs another piece of data, that it's programmed to output. Also - something else that exists in both is the way the data is propagated to the end of the compuation. Haskell is said to be lazy, which means that if something doesn't need to be computed it doesn't compute. The same happens in the DG - if a node doesn't need to be computed the DG simply doesn't force computation. A node asks for data input ONLY if that same node needs to execute a computation. The meaning of Lazy Evaluation is explained in Wikipedia very well: 

In computer programming, lazy evaluation (or delayed evaluation) is the technique of delaying a computation until such time as the result of the computation is known to be needed. 

I think I`ll continue to read about Haskell. I very much like the concepts behind it. At first it looked strange to me but then I realised I am already thinking in his way when working with the DG in Maya.

 

 
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button PDF Print
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 27 March 2009 10:23
I haven't seen the film yet. I actually wonder if I want to see it as I don't like such a themes in a movie. It looks a little dark to me. But the visual effects are stunning. Here is a video from the TED conference, where Ed Ulbrich explains some of the approaches they did at Digital Domain to make Brad Pitt older. And of course it involves FACS again.
 
 
 
 
I was so so so sure... but no :( PDF Print
Written by Administrator   
Tuesday, 24 March 2009 17:10

Few weeks ago someone pointed me to the movie below:

 

 

 

First I thought it was a fan project, tribute to Half Life and Lost and nothing more.  It is shooted in first person  ,with some interesting effects. The thing that captured my attention though was that it's almost one shot, and that the camera passes through several streets without seeing any person. Also there are cars and buses that are all over the street. This I thought was not easy to achieve. And I still think it wasn't easy for them. I would  have passed that as any other movie I see on youtube these days, but I made a search on the internet and found a forum where they already were discussing this movie. The forum was "unfiction" and the post that got my attention was this:

 ---------------------------------------------
Youtube video What's in the Box? - Test Film 2009 posted on Mar 13 2009 from account Timacious, registered June 22 2007. Comment reads "This is a early temp version. Will be deleted soon." Video is said to contain heavy Half Life references including a similar universe and concept, borrowed sound effects, usage of the phrase "What's in the Box?", and a news ticker reading "MILLIONS FEARED DEAD - NO NEWS FROM DISASTER AREA - LARGEST SINGLE COLLAPSE IN HISTORY SINCE BLACK MESA", leading some viewers to immediately assume the video to be a viral add for Half Life 2: Ep 3. Some claims are made that the video is an advertisement for Samsung, Sony Ericsson, LG, or Acer because of the product placement. Also, it is noted that most of the music in the video is ripped directly from Lost, written by Michael Giacchino, with the possible exception of a track from The Lost World - Jurassic Park 2 by John Williams when the man in the video runs from the bus around 5:00 into the video. The scenery in the video is recognized as the city Nijmegen, Netherlands.

There are 3 other videos uploaded by the Timacious account:

Discovery Mythbusters - The Phone Book Myth, uploaded Nov 20 2007, shows the Dutch student Tim Smit and friend Steven Roeters attempting to separate two interwoven phone books as a part of Discovery Channel's Be a Mythbuster contest. At 3:53 a red logo of a tilted square with a question mark in the center shows, with unreadable text beneath it. This appears again at 4:31. According to this article, Tim Smit and Steven Roeters are Natural Science students at Radboud University, won the contest, and flew out to meet the real Mythbusters in Feb 2008. The article also mentions that they are working on What's in the Box.

Terminator 2 - Sweded, uploaded May 13 2008, is a humorously low-budget re-enactment of the 1991 film Terminator 2: Judgment Day. The credits for the video, shown at 1:17, list Tim Smit among other names. The same logo of a tilted square with a question mark in the center can be seen twice during these credits (bottom-right at 1:17, bottom-left at 1:19).

Storm Chasers - Becoming Tornadoproof, uploaded Dec 16 2008, appears to be an entry for Discovery Channel's Storm Chasers contest. The video is a spoof instructional video about becoming "Tornadoproof" and features a character named "The Extreme". At 0:14 in, the gearshift of the car can be seen to be a Terminator's metallic skull. At 1:00, a piece of debris resembling part of a wall falls to the ground in the background and is destroyed. As the piece is falling, the logo of a tilted square with a question mark in the center can be seen on it for a split second. The email address Timaciousd.at.gmail.com can be seen at 1:17. This email address seems to be a reference to the band Tenacious D.

Website http://whatsinthebox.nl/ displays a tilted square with a question mark in the center. The square pulses with light, revealing that is actually 3-dimensional, a cube or box. The box appears to have sparks emanating from it. 4 digits in the center of the screen cycle between a number of strings. At the bottom of the screen, motion picture-style credits read:

PRODUCTIONS presents a MYSTERY OF MYSTERIES production "WHAT IS IN THE BOX"
writers TIMSMIT THIBAUT NIELS music created by STEVEN ROETERS directory of photography TIMSMIT production design THIBAUT NIELS TIMSMIT
special effects TIMSMIT screenplay written by THIBAUT NIELS TIMSMIT website complex by TIM MEEUWISSEN TIMSMIT film editor TIMSMIT produced and directed by TIMSMIT THIBAUT NIELS
additional thanks to FRANK TER ELST JURI JOOSTEN and MARKUP
2007 A PRODUCTIONS official series. All rights reserved

When moused-over, the box flashes red, text appears within and below the box, and question marks appear over certain letters within the credits. With some visual adjustments, the text in the box can be seen to be the lyrics of Tenacious D's song Beelzebob.

The letters from the credits which are covered with question marks read something like this:

OTION nts ST WHAT IS IN THE BOX
TIS CREA TEV O ector phy BAUT
SM S TH IS EEU S dito MS c ec MIT T
dition R TER EL U OOS d AR

or this:

O TION nts ST WHAT IS IN THE BOX
s TI crea TEV RO ector phy BAUT MSM
SM TH IMS EEU S MS c ec MIT UT
ditio R ER EL U OOS d AR

or this:

O(T)ION NT (S) ST "WHAT IS IN THE BOX"
ST(IM) CREA TE (R)O (C)TOR
PH(Y) BAUT MSM
S Th IMS EEU SM EDI-(Possibly DIT from the word EDITOR) CE ED MIT UT
DITO R ER ELS OOS(T) D R

It's hard to tell which letters are actually supposed to be covered and which are not, because in some cases a question mark covers part of a letter but not the entire thing.

Decompiling the flash object on the page reveals that the 4-digit string is an array called bullshitArray, and contains the strings:
0001 WSAD 134G ASDF 123A 1234 5223 QWER FASG 4213 UUUU READ FAST JFSD 2123 BOXR SAGA JFSD 2123 6335 2347 2678 7856 1111 0003

When the source of the page is viewed, a comment can be found which reads:
Every medium, as its ancestors
Every pro, has his anti's, now you think about that

Also, a link to the image Anti.jpg, which shows the box and credits again, but with different text behind the box. With visual adjustments, this text has been found to be from this page about Dye-sensitized solar cells. The numbers 71-73.5% and 87% are highlighted in red and differ from the numbers on the site, and the word ATTAINABLLNESS is overlayed near the bottom. This seems to be a misspelling of "attainableness". Rather than a question mark in the center, the box contains some math formulas and images of squares. It has been suggested that the 4 cube graphics within the main cube are representations of a hypercube rotating in 3-space. The top math formula (V2n=integrals) integral is the volume of a cube of side length 2n, but the rest of the math at this point seems to be insignificant. The EXIF of the image shows the graphic was made on 2007/03/12 at 15:19:54 using Photoshop CS for Windows.

A whois of the site shows that it is hosted in the Netherlands, was registered by "T. Smit" 2006-07-13, and was updated on 2006-10-03.

Other info about Tim Smit and Steven Roeters:
- Tim Smit apparently designed an Urban Security Suit which bears resemblance to the generic-ish jumpsuits worn by the men in the What's in the Box video
- Steven Roeters may have some connection to Biosurface Spectroscopy Research: http://www.amolf.nl/research/biosurface-spectroscopy/group-members/amolf-person/article///ce40933c27/?tx_ooipamolfpeople_pi1[showUid]=10891
- Tim Smit's name is a palindrome (TIMSMIT is the same backwards and forwards); Tim Smit is also not an uncommon name in the Netherlands

Other notes about the What's in the Box video:
- The device that the "box" is in at the beginning of the video is an Atomic Force Microscope
- The phone number that the runner is attempting to dial is 59462
- At 5:21 when the runner removes the Brain Computer Interface, it has a Windows Blue Screen of Death, specifically a page fault (error 0x0E)
- At 6:44 when the runner is hiding in the house, as he turns, an image of a face can be seen briefly. It was suggested that this face resembled a Heavy from Team Fortress 2, but I think this idea has already been dispelled because it was discovered that the face is merely a wall ornament in the house
- All of the birds in the background fall dead out of the air at 8:20
- It was suggested that 3 different brands of cell phones were shown because of a law in the Netherlands that requires at least 3 brands of a certain product to be mentioned in order for a film or TV show to not be considered advertisement. I'm not sure, however, what this says about the Acer handheld at 1:05 and the Philips monitor at 0:54

Links to other threads:
Reddit Videos
Reddit Gaming
RelicNews

My thoughts:
- The usage of Half Life sound effects and ideas, Lost and Jurassic Park music, and the brand names of Samsung, Sony Ericsson, LG, Acer, and Philips is undeniable, but I think they are (intentionally or unintentionally?) sidetracking people into thinking this is an advert. Sure, it may just be a HL2:EP3 viral, but then again it may not be. Let's find out. Also, if it IS a HL2:EP3 viral, doesn't it seem weird that it would use borrowed music and such? Seems like that would be a copyright issue.
- Both of the Discovery Channel videos, as well as the Terminator video, show the box with the question mark inside. This may just be the logo for Tim Smit's studio PRODUCTIONS, but nevertheless the concept of the box has been floating around for a while now. The registration date of the http://whatsinthebox.nl/ URL and EXIF on the anti.jpg image confirm this. If Valve is somehow involved, and this is indeed a HL2:EP3 viral, this would mean Valve was already planning it before they released HL2:EP2.
- The Tower of Babel and the Box seems to be the main focus of the video, with the math formulas and hypercube illustration possibly hinting at some 4th-dimensional stuff. But, the website, anti.jpg, and Steven Roeters page bring up another topic, which is the solar energy stuff. To me, the red highlighted numbers in anti.jpg, which are higher than the numbers from the Biosurface Spectroscopy Research, are directly related the ATTAINABLLNESS; that is to say, that with a some sort of new technology/research/whatever, some sort of high-efficiency solar energy capturing device/ethod could be attainable.
- There seems to be a Terminator theme going on here, between the Terminator 2: Sweded video, and the Terminator gearshift in the car in Discovery Channel: Storm Chasers. I don't know if this means anything; probably just that Tim Smit and his crew like the Terminator. ALSO: about the solar cells, "These cells were invented by Michael Graetzel in 1991 and are also known as Graetzel cells". 1991, same year as Terminator 2.
- There also seems to be a Tenacious D theme, between the TimaciousD email address and the lyrics in the background on the page. Again, I have a feeling Tim Smit just likes Tenacious D.
---------------------------

I so much like riddles that I thought it was just that- a riddle... a viral from a big company that wanted the users to bang their head against the walls as I did to "solve" it. As it turned out it's just simple demo reel. I hate when something like that happens. It's like getting the best toy in the world from my hands. I so wished it was a riddle that I believed in that.

 

People tend to believe in strange things. And if they are really strange, they are most believable. True story. 

 
More Articles...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 6 of 25

View Marin Petrov's profile on LinkedIn